Anonymized website feedback

Overall I think it looks good, but I think perhaps Marketing people (who I imagine are a key audience) may not understand the BYOK / OpenRouter stuff — I will admit I don't! Think we need some FAQs about this to explain it more, unless it's become regular marketing parlance in recent memory? I also think we mention parametric before explaining what that means (tho I'm on iPhone so perhaps some sections are carousels and I haven't realised that / can't see all the content?)

I really like it! It's clean and simple, and easy to understand even for non-experts. The terminology is clear and straightforward, nothing feels confusing, and everything is very easy to read. The only thing missing is my photo in the Team section :-)

Hey! I went though that new webpage. To be honest, everything just looks good and I don't have much to say (usually I'm the person who find the missing dot or typo or something, but in this case I didn't notice such issues) . Really like the design and colours :slightly_smiling_face: Probably the only thing that I don't like (subjectively) how percents above `garage` and `rarefield` words are crossed with another ones (I understand that's really minot though)

Looks amazing to start with but heres my feedback: 1. These two buttons are pressable but don't change the text or do anything 2. I think it would be better if we swapped around these two parametric and dynamic tiles, this is a preference thing but this page is left side heavy so having parametric on the right helps it stand out a bit better and I think it logically makes more sense 3. I think we should also include the blog in the header 4. The X accounts linked to you and [PERSON] go to accounts that dont exist anymore 5. [PERSON]' linkedin link doesnt work

I think it looks nice. It clearly communicates what company is focused on and does a good job of making potential customers think about why these metrics matter in 2026. I also really like grainy dark visual style geosurge uses in its design.

Looks sweet but there are some bugs I found: Pages switch is really slow on first load Not sure that it is clear what these percentages mean I assume it may be only me, but at first glance I thought that red color text is a button as it seems more like CTA then white one Some of the headings have a period at the end, some don’t. Looks inconsistent Do these numbers have meaning? Nitpick but it looks like text does not fit at the bottom, there is more space in the top left corner than bottom left one Maybe it is just me (as a person far from the AI-tech part), but I am not sure what this gif shows Is it okay that the text changes color for the last sentence? Wouldn’t it be better UX to show the trend (+18%) under the current visibility percent? Compared to other blocks, the Competitors block has too small padding Just in terms of UI/UX, maybe better to also say what is SEO as you did with GEO. Just like contrast Is it a placeholder or anonymous? Does not sound credible do be honest …small pause for meeting…to be continued… Most of the links are not working in footer 1. Isn’t Free = $0? Looks like duplication 2. Double `/` Why does the pricing page have more questions in the FAQ compared to the main page? Shouldn’t it be the same or more generic questions (what is geoSurge) on main page or separate FAQ page? It looks like there are unnecessarily large gaps above and below the FAQ section on the pricing page Team images could be optimised as they load much longer than the page itself. They are 1.2k, but the block is 380px max. Social links are not working --— DONE ----

I don't have much useful feedback tbh I'm really impressed it looks and feels very solid. Tested both light and dark model along with my screen vs on a larger monitor and everything rendered nicely. The only things I noticed : • Sometimes when clicking a button nothing happens and I have to click again... sometimes its quite slow (these have been very few cases overall) • [CLIENT] being used in the app screenshot at the top. Not sure if this is deliberate or whether we should be showing a client but wanted to flag in case

Honestly not really a lot bu This is still fake This border feels weird, idk if intentional

If possible adding any enterprise logos would add a lot of credibility *Form fields for lead scoring (without overwhelming prospects)* • *Company name.* Our enrichment anchor. We auto-append size, industry and funding via Clearbit/Apollo so we don't need to ask directly. • *Work email.* Require a business domain and reject free ones. This filters low-intent signups and powers most of our enrichment automatically. • *Company size.* A single dropdown (1–10 / 11–50 / 51–200 / 201–1000 / 1000+). One click and we have our strongest fit signal for the enterprise threshold. • *Role.* Dropdown with a short list: Marketing/Brand, RevOps/Growth, Founder/Exec, Agency, Other. Tells us immediately whether we're speaking to a champion or a budget holder. • *What are we trying to do?* One dropdown: "Measure how AI sees our brand" / "Improve how AI sees our brand" / "Manage this for clients" / "Just exploring." The "improve" answer is a direct enterprise intent signal; "agency" routes to our highest-LTV segment. • *Message.* Keep it, make it optional. Prospects who fill it in are self-selecting as higher intent.

First of all, I I love the new website, the design is next level :heart:. Feedback: 1. I don't know if it's because it's a Dev version, but it seems very heavy. My Google Chrome was slow and close to crashing. 2. I would give more weight to Boost / Corpus Engineering on the "How it Works" section. Point 4 (You Change it) and it's explanation is a huge oversimplification. That is our coolest technology and USP, I think we can make it sound more appealing than "Levers to shift how the models talk about you". I know we have a section for Corpus Engineering after, but this first sections will define if the user scrolls down, or leaves. 3. FAQs - Which models do you cover? I would expand a bit to: _ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini, the three frontier models your buyers are most likely to ask. We run your prompts across all of them, and if another model gains real market share or becomes specifically relevant to you, we'll track that too._ 4. There is a small typo in the answer of Pricing/FAQs/What is corpus engineering? 5. I love everything else. [RECIPIENT] not website feedback, but I love the BYOK thing as a business strategy. I think it is bold and we are gonna kill it.

[ANON] FEEDBACK TLDW: Quick fixes / typos • Two spots have a "Z" where it should be an "S" - in the wordmark and in the "Page rank era/The answer layer" section. Messaging & content • Hero has a lot of blank space and no headline/CTA - would love a simple "what is this" line (e.g. visibility tagline) so it's instantly clear. • "Corpus Engineering" should be introduced here for the first time - could hyperlink it to an explainer page, use capital C/E and trademark, and ideally surface it in the nav. • The "tailored text for models to learn from" description needs rewording - as-is it could read like spammy hacking. I've drafted an alternative in the doc Design & layout • Several elements wrap onto two lines when there's space to keep them on one - let's tighten and move things up (the "you give us the prompts" and "two kinds of AI" sections especially). • "Two kinds of AI" - love the design. We should call out that we do BOTH, and make those stand out. A graphic (the iceberg/parametric vs dynamic) would help - text-heavy right now. I think [PERSON] is already on this though... Interactivity • The clickable cards look great, but clicking doesn't do anything yet - I'd expect something to happen. Same for a couple of other clickable-looking elements. • Could the "see it in one panel" view be made interactive? (Later version is fine - prefer the one in our colours.) Nav & analytics • Add a News or Blog item to the nav. • Can we get scroll/engagement metrics so we know how far people actually get down the page? Dark mode • I prefer dark mode - maybe default to it. One concern: the cream text may be hard to read - might need to be whiter/lighter/slightly larger. *Fun idea* • The "garage startup" line - saw an article that it's shifting to "sofa startups" in the AI era. Could be a fun thing for us to track... *On me:* source 2 images for the team section, update FAQs and the "Model Behaviour/Engineering Reservations" copy in the backend.